![]() In theory, the goal of peer review is to improve the manuscript, both conceptually and practically (e.g., language, referencing, organization). Step 3 – Assessing Different Types of Reviews and Follow-Up In these cases, formulating a thorough and well-argued response becomes all the more critical to help you allay the concerns of the critical reviewers and reinforce the conclusions of the positive reviewers. Sometimes, reviewers’ opinions may differ, with some having a very positive impression and others offering harsh critique. If your article is (unfortunately) rejected, you can follow the instructions above in Section 1C. At that point, they will assess whether the updated version should be accepted for publication. Commonly, your article will be sent back to the reviewers for a second review. It then becomes your job to take a close look at the suggestions and determine whether you agree or disagree with them and whether implementing the suggestions is feasible given your current time availability and resources.Įven if you decide to implement the suggestions and make the requested changes, this is not a guarantee that the article will be accepted for publication. The reviewers may recommend revisions they would like you to make to your manuscript. Once these are completed, you can resubmit your article to the journal for further review. If the reviewers recommend publication, they may ask you to make minor corrections and revisions. This process will usually result in one of three scenarios:* If your article is sent out for review, it will generally be sent to between 3-5 reviewers who will be asked to give feedback on the article and advise whether it is suitable for publication. Step 2 – The Academic Peer Review Process If you don’t receive confirmation of your article’s submission within a week after submitting it, consider following up to ensure that it was actually received. You may also wish to ask them for feedback about why the manuscript was rejected, so you can improve it before submitting it elsewhere. In some cases, the editor might suggest alternative publication avenues that they think are more suitable. But usually, the most sensible path is simply to move on and try to find another journal or publisher. You can choose to appeal if you think that a mistake has been made. Reject – If the editor decides that the article is not suitable for the journal, they may send you a rejection. ![]() ![]() If this is the case, be sure to choose carefully to give yourself the best chance of receiving a positive review. Some journals and publishers will allow you to suggest reviewers for your article. While this is certainly an encouraging first step, it does not guarantee that the reviewers will come back with a favorable report. Pass it on to reviewers for peer review – If the editor deems the article deserving of consideration, they will pass the manuscript on to reviewers in the field for peer review.Return it for further revisions – If the editor notices what they deem to be a basic issue (e.g., the paper is not formatted according to the journal guidelines, or the language requires heavy editing), they may send it back to you for revision before considering whether to pass it along for review.In most cases, after your manuscript is submitted, it undergoes an initial review by one of the journal editors. Step 1 – Desk Review by the Journal Editor Remember that every journal or editor has its own specific requirements, response time, and work methods: therefore, your experience may differ from our general overview. Therefore, to prepare for success, you should keep in mind what to expect from the process. Remember– what you do after you complete your initial submission can be as important as your original research and writing for getting your work published. However, in many cases, this is only the start of a lengthy back-and-forth with editors and reviewers, with no guaranteed end result. Now that you’ve submitted your academic manuscript to a journal or publisher, it can be easy to think that you are finished with your research process. Give yourself the best chance to succeed!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |